Sunday, April 6, 2025

Defense News: Rafael Successfully Tests Typhoon 30 Remote Weapon System Against Aerial Threats

 

Rafael Successfully Tests Typhoon 30 Remote Weapon System Against Aerial Threats


The advanced field test showcased the system's ability to counter drones and highlighted its modular deployment 

By Eyal Boguslavsky, Israel Defense, 02/04/2025

Photo: Rafael video screenshot


Israeli defense company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems announced that it has successfully conducted another advanced field test of its Typhoon 30 Remote Weapon Station (RWS) in Israel. The test focused on the system’s ability to counter unmanned aerial threats and demonstrated its modular deployment capabilities.

In its announcement, the company stated that the test showcased the system's enhanced ability to neutralize drones at various ranges and demonstrated its modular adaptability on a 20-foot modular surface.

RAFAEL Successfully Demos TYPHOON 30's C-UAS Capabilities (photo credit: RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS)


RAFAEL describes the Typhoon 30 as a combat-proven system that continues to evolve in response to operational needs across multiple environments. It is designed to protect critical infrastructure and military positions against a growing range of low-cost and easily deployed aerial threats.

The increasing threat posed by commercial and military-grade drones has driven many defense manufacturers to accelerate the development of short-range air defense systems. In October 2024, we reported that the Israeli Ministry of Defense was expediting the development of advanced interception technologies against UAVs. As part of this effort, the ministry conducted a first-of-its-kind operational test at a testing field in southern Israel, featuring participation from eight Israeli defense companies—including Elbit, IAI, and RAFAEL—which presented a variety of interception solutions, including Rafael’s Typhoon 30 system.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Science News: Megalodon shark may have reached 80 feet, new study finds

 

Megalodon shark may have reached 80 feet, new study finds


Megalodon sharks roamed the seas between 20 million and 3.6 million years ago.


By Jerusalem Post Staff, March 16th, 2025


an illustration of a shark being eaten by an even larger shark Scientists have long assumed megalodons looked like big great white sharks, but new research suggests this is not the case (photo credit: Baris-Ozer via Getty Images)


The now-extinct megalodon shark may have been larger than first believed, reaching lengths of 80 feet (24.3 meters), according to a new study published in Palaeontologia Electronica last week. 

This is about the length of an eight-story building, meaning that megalodon sharks were about 4.5 meters longer than existing predictions. 

Megalodon sharks roamed the seas between 20 million and 3.6 million years ago. Despite this, no whole megalodon (Otodus megalodon) skeleton has ever been discovered, so most of the scientific research about them comes from fossils of their vertebrae scales and teeth.


"Previous estimates using teeth to predict its size had the shark reaching about 18-20 meters total length (59-65 feet)," co-author Phillip Sternes told Live Science

In the new study, however, researchers examined megalodon fossils and compared them to over 150 living and extinct shark species to try to build an image of the size of the giant shark. 



The researchers have developed a revised tentative body outline of a 80 foot megalodon (credit: DePaul University/Kenshu Shimada)


Part of the research involved comparing sections of the megalodon's trunk with the trunks of 145 modern and 20 extinct shark species. The largest megalodon fossil ever found is a 36-foot-long (11 m) section of its spine.

The researches based the estimations on the assumption that the megalodon was roughly proportional to other shark species, and then extrapolated from the 36 feet (11 meter) trunk section, to estimate that it may have had a 6 feet (1.8 meter) long head and 3.6 meter long tail, making it a total of 54 feet (16.4 meters)

Assuming that the megalodon was roughly proportional to the majority of other shark species, and extrapolating from the 36-foot (11 m) trunk section, the researchers estimated that this individual shark may have had a 6-foot-long (1.8 m) head and 12-foot-long (3.6 meter) tail, giving it a total length of 54 feet (16.4 meters).


Megalodon shark jaws and teeth at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. (credit: Wikimedia Commons)


However, one discovered megalodon vertebra measured much longer - at 9 inches (23 centimeters) in diameter — 3 inches (7.6 cm) bigger than the largest vertebra from the 54-foot shark.

Using this figure, this vertebra most likely belonged to a megalodon that measured in at 80 feet long.


Appearance of the megalodon

The study also found that the live offspring of the megalodon may have been 12 to 13 feet (3.6 to 3.9 m) long.

The teeth of megalodon sharks are similar to that of modern-day great white sharks, as both are similarly serrated. This led scientists to believe that the megalodon resembled a great white.

"Previous studies simply assumed that megalodon must have looked like a gigantic version of the modern great white shark without any evidence," study lead author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiology professor at DePaul University in Chicago, told Live Science.

However, new research found that the megalodon was more likely slender and streamlined.


Based on the revised maximum body size, as well as hydrodynamic models of how creatures like whale sharks (Rhincodon typus), basking sharks (Cetorhinus Maximus), and whales move through the water, the researchers decided that the megalodon was more similar in build to a lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris).







THIS PAGE WAS POSTED BY SPUTNIK ONE OF THE SPUTNIKS ORBIT BLOG

https://disqus.com/HOME/FORUM/THESPUTNIKSORBIT-BLOGSPOT-COM

How a new wave of fighter jets could transform aerial combat

APRIL 1, 2025, by D. Bacci, The Conversation

Unpiloted aircraft could act as "wingmen" to support piloted sixth generation jets. 
Credit: US Air Force

The most advanced fighter jets in the world are known as "fifth generation." They contain technologies developed in the first part of the 21st century. Examples of fifth generation fighter jets include America's F-35 Lightning II and F-22 Raptor, China's Chengdu J-20 and Russia's Sukhoi SU-57.

Now, however, nations are moving ahead with the sixth generation of combat jets. In the past few months, China has flown its J36 and J50 prototype jets. Meanwhile, the US has selected Boeing to build a new fighter aircraft called the F-47.

As with previous generations, the sixth will incorporate major advances in aircraft design, onboard electronics (avionics) and weapon systems.

But how will the new generation of jets stand out from the previous one? Future combat jets will not see dramatic increases in maximum speed, nor in flight performance. Instead, the true innovations will be in how these systems operate and achieve dominance in aerial combat.

Like the fifth generation, the sixth will be dominated by stealth technology. This helps fighters jets to reduce their chances of being detected by infrared and radar sensors, to the point that when their signatures are eventually picked up, the opponent has no time to act.

Stealth is achieved through particular shapes of airframe (such as diamond shapes) and coatings on the aircraft—called radar absorbing materials. The airframe is the fundamental structural framework of an aircraft, encompassing the fuselage, wings, tail assembly and landing gear.

The diamond-like shapes that already characterize fifth generation jets are likely to remain in the upcoming generation of fighter, but they will evolve.

A common feature we're likely to see is the reduction or complete removal of vertical tails at the back of the aircraft and their control surfaces. In current aircraft, these tails provide directional stability and control in flight, allowing the aircraft to maintain its course and maneuver.

However, sixth generation jets could achieve this control with the help of thrust vectoring—the ability to manipulate the direction of engines and therefore the direction of thrust (the force that moves the jet through the air).

The role of vertical tails could also be partially replaced by devices called fluidic actuators. These apply forces to the wing by blowing high speed and high pressure air on different parts of it.

The removal of the vertical tails would contribute to the fighter's stealth. The new generation of fighters is also likely to see the use of novel radar absorbing materials with advanced capabilities.

We'll see the introduction of what are known as adaptive cycle engines on sixth generation fighters. These engines will feature what's known as a three stream design, which refers to the airstreams blowing through the engine. Current jets have two airstreams: one that passes through the core of the engine, and another that bypasses the core.

The development of a third stream provides an extra source of air flow to increase the engine's fuel efficiency and performance. This will allow both the capability to cruise efficiently at supersonic speed and deliver a high thrust during combat.

It is likely that China and the US will build two separate fighters with different airframes. One will have a bigger airframe, designed for use in an area like the Pacific Ocean region. Here, the ability to fly further and carry a heavier payload will be key, because of the distances involved. Airframes designed for this region will therefore be larger.

Another fighter jet carrying a smaller airframe will be designed for use in areas such as Europe where agility and maneuverability will be more important.

The next wave of jets will have a system in the cockpit that gathers lots of information from other aircraft, ground surveillance stations and satellites. It would then integrate this data to give an enhanced situational awareness to the pilot. This system would also able to actively jam enemy sensors.

Another key feature will be the deployment of unmanned combat aerial vehicles (Ucavs), a form of drone aircraft. The piloted fighter jet would be able to control a variety of Ucavs, ranging from loyal wingmen to cheaper, unpiloted fighter jets that will assist the mission, including protecting the piloted fighter.

This will all be the responsibility of something called the advanced digital cockpit, a software-driven system that will use virtual reality and allow the pilot to effectively become a battle manager. Artificial intelligence (AI) will be a key feature of the support systems for the drones. This will allow them to be controlled with complete autonomy. The pilot will assign the main task—such as, "attack that enemy jet in that sector"—and the system will carry out the mission without any further input.

Another advancement will be the weapon systems, with the adoption of missiles that not only will be capable of traveling at hypersonic speeds, but will also incorporate stealth features. This will further reduce the reaction times of enemy forces. Directed energy weapons systems, such as laser weapons, could potentially appear in later stages, as this technology is under study.

Under America's sixth generation fighter program, the US Navy is working on a separate jet called the F/A-XX, complementing the F-47.

The UK, Italy and Japan are also working on a jet project known as the global combat air program (GCAP). This will replace the Eurofighter Typhoon in service with the UK and Italy and the Mitsubishi F-2 in service with Japan.

Germany, Spain and France are working on a fighter program called the future combat air system (FCAS). This could supersede Germany and Spain's Typhoons and France's Rafale.

The path for sixth generation fighter jets seems to have already been traced, but uncertainties remain. The feasibility of some of the characteristics described and development times and costs are not yet well defined. This interval of time was more than ten years for fifth generation fighter jets—and the sixth is going to be far more complex in terms of requirements and capability.

A new generation of fighter jet is expected to remain on active duty for something like 30 years. But warfare across the world evolves rapidly. It is unclear whether the design requirements we are fixing today remain relevant over the coming years.



Recommend this post and follow
Sputnik's Orbit