Energy codes pilot study takes flight in New York
The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is lending its expertise to help New York City make significant gains in building efficiency and decarbonization.
The pilot study, a collaboration between PNNL and the Department of Buildings of New York City (NYC), began last year and was recently extended for a second phase. Its purpose is to pave the path for more energy-efficient city buildings by putting new approaches to energy regulations to the test using PNNL-developed tools to make compliance easier.
Buildings use 75% of the country’s power and 40% of its overall energy, resulting in 35% of the country’s carbon emissions. Buildings, as a driving force in the national energy landscape, have the ability to save significant amounts of energy. Governments, universities, and businesses are all working hard to find ways to meet ambitious energy goals.
Buildings in New York City account for roughly 70% of the city’s greenhouse gas emissions. Energy codes that result in more energy-efficient buildings will be critical to the city’s objective of becoming carbon-neutral by 2050. In fact, in 2018, Local Law 32 was enacted, requiring a performance-based code in the 2025 New York City Energy Conservation Code and improved energy-efficiency requirements for new buildings. The pilot study, which was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE), is a step toward achieving that goal.
Energy codes are a subset of building codes, which establish minimum requirements and govern building construction. Energy codes encompass requirements for the energy performance of a building, including its systems and related components.
Credit: Composite image by Cortland Johnson | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
“This pilot is unique because for the very first time, we are testing the removal of the prescriptive approach that has always been used in energy codes,” said PNNL mechanical engineer and lead tool developer, Supriya Goel. “With the prescriptive approach, there is no extra credit for doing more, and if one thing is not done exactly, the whole building is considered non-code compliant.
“For example, prescriptive codes typically limit the amount of light and solar gain allowed in by windows to reduce cooling energy. But well-planned designs that take advantage of passive heating, or those that automatically reduce the electric light required during the day, may benefit from increased solar gain. Performance-based codes can recognize these benefits, while prescriptive codes cannot.”
Testing a new approach for energy codes
For the pilot, PNNL developed a 100 percent performance-based energy code.
Within this performance-based code, there are two different ways to show compliance. One way is to assess whole-building performance, which mirrors the current national energy code standard for commercial buildings but reflects NYC’s own policy goals and energy code requirements.
A second option evaluates energy performance at the building systems level, such as HVAC, lighting, and envelope. A building’s envelope system includes things that separate its interior and exterior, like the foundation, walls, roof, windows, and doors.
System-based performance approaches are meant to address one of the main criticisms of whole-building performance approaches where an improved system with a shorter lifespan, such as an HVAC system, could make up for a less efficient system with longer-term impacts, such as the building envelope. By encouraging tradeoffs within a system, that concern is mitigated.
“A performance-based code offers more flexibility in how we can evaluate a building’s energy efficiency,” said Goel. “A more efficient building results from making sure each building system is compliant on its own.”
Side-by-side comparison of a simplified system performance model (left) versus a typical whole-building energy performance model (right).
Credit: Composite image by Jeff London | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
For the study, compliance of each building system is being measured using energy modeling or other tools developed by PNNL. Each tool is being used to assess compliance of a different building system in select new buildings.
COMcheck, a software tool built by PNNL to assist in documenting energy code compliance, is being used to assess building envelope systems. Lighting systems are being evaluated using PNNL’s Lighting System Performance Spreadsheet. And HVAC systems are being measured using the HVAC System Performance tool.
Until now, checking compliance with NYC’s performance-based energy codes has involved analyzing whole-building performance using complex energy modeling and simulation software that is expensive and time-consuming to use. A goal of the current study is to find a simpler way to meet the mark while exploring ways to make sure each building system is using energy efficiently.
An expanded scope for broader impact
The first round of the pilot study is wrapping up with 10 participants and a strong interest to keep going. With a new funding infusion from the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy’s Building Technologies Office, a second phase is now in the works. Phase two of the study will draw on learnings from the first phase to improve outcomes and expand to include more projects.
“During this next phase, we’ll continue the work we started, but with new participants and tool refinements based on phase one results,” said Michael Tillou, PNNL mechanical engineer and pilot project lead. “We’ll also expand it now to look at whole-building simulation pathways, including simplified approaches, as well as alternative metrics that will result in reduced CO2 emissions to help meet NYC’s policy goals.”
The performance-based compliance pathways being studied as part of the pilot were developed by the Building Technologies Office’s Building Energy Codes Program at PNNL. The program is led by chief scientist and PNNL code program manager Michael Rosenberg.
Results of the study will be used to improve the proposed alternate performance compliance pathways for future New York energy codes and could be used as a model for other cities and states. While the effort started out focused on NYC, phase two will include feedback from the New York State Stretch 2023 code enhancement process. As part of this process, the state is also considering system-based performance as an approach to compliance with building energy codes. Ultimately, energy codes adopted at the state level must be met even if city-specific codes are in place.
“This now gives us an opportunity to help future codes at both state and city levels align with each other,” said Rosenberg. “In doing so, we play a role in helping move buildings across the state of New York toward a more efficient future.”
Recommend this post and follow
Sputnik's Orbit
Posted by coded Chuck
No comments:
Post a Comment